Ooh, they’ve got salad … I’ll have the fries

Yummy celebratory McDonald's feast for lunch. The 1955 burger is ANIMAL. #foodporn

Photo by Sinéad Cochrane [iamvisi] via Flickr, used under a Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Stephanie Clifford had a nice article in The New York Times over the weekend. In it, she reported on social science that considers a counter-intuitive effect: as restaurants like fast-food chains offer more healthful options, folks tend to opt for even less nutritious selections than they would have in the absence of the better-for-you choices. As she explains,

Gavan J. Fitzsimons, a professor who studies consumer psychology at Duke’s Fuqua School of Business, has researched the disconnect.

In studies, he has presented participants with a range of menu choices — sometimes just unhealthy items, sometimes neutral items (like a fish sandwich) and sometimes healthy choices like salad. It turned out that including a healthy option did change people’s behavior — by making them eat more unhealthily.

“When you put a healthy option up there on an otherwise unhealthy menu, not only do we not pick it, but its presence on the menu leads us to swing over and pick something that’s worse for us than we normally would,” Mr. Fitzsimons said.

Why? Mr. Fitzsimons called the phenomenon “vicarious goal fulfillment.” By seeing a healthy menu option at a restaurant, “it basically satisfies that goal to be healthy,” he said, and gives consumers leeway to order what they want.

Find the fascinating full article here.


Share your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s